High Five?

by Pete 4. March 2010 17:15

365 days of pure High Fiving goodness.

High Five.pdf (408.53 kb)

Tags:

An Open Letter To The BBC Trust

by Pete 2. March 2010 22:04

To whom it may concern,

Hello.

As a voiceover on BBC 6Music, and therefore a supplier of goods, I’m not 100% sure if I’m meant to maintain an impartial stance on today’s news or not, but speaking from a listener’s unbiased perspective, the publishing of today’s Digital Strategy Review has surprised me somewhat, especially considering the clean bill of health the station received from the BBC Trust last month.

I understand that like anything, the BBC is a business and as such needs to keep expenditure at a manageable level. I also understand that with a General Election looming, the political pressure coming from the Conservative party asking the BBC to justify its financial output needs appeasing. But the one thing I can’t understand is why the BBC executives feel the need to “fix” something that’s not really broken.

It’s probably a tired old cliché by now, but 6Music is, without doubt, an exceptional radio station. It’s one of the only radio stations in the entire country that champions the underdog and actively encourages and helps nurture new talent. Tom Robinson’s show is dedicated to it. With Steve Lamacq being such a devout gig-goer he advocates others to do the same. In an age where musicians can only really gain money by gig sales and not album sales; in a climate where the average band can only dream of breaking-even through record sales alone, 6Music has proven to be a valuable resource, helping artists get the audiences they need to maintain themselves. It truly is an inspiration to a lot of people.

With such a loyal listener base, closing down 6Music will leave an entire generation of listeners with nowhere to go. A whole 20 to 30-something demographic alienated, feeling too old or fed up to listen to Radio 1, too young for Radio 2, not really willing to make the jump to commercial radio. I can’t say I blame them; there’s nothing that really CAN compare to 6Music, not nationally, anyway. Stations like XFM and Absolute Radio attempt to bridge the gap (the latter even makes a half-decent attempt at it), yet at the end of the day they’re still governed by commercial models; models that cannot be applied to 6Music, whose programming isn’t governed by top line numbers, RAJAR diaries or quarterly sales figures; just pure, unbridled passion for playing the music that it loves. There just wouldn’t be any viable impact on the commercial sector by closing the station down.

If the reasoning behind the proposed closure is purely down to expenditure, it doesn’t make sense to me. The figures don’t stack up. There are approximately 23 million households in the UK. For argument’s sake, let’s say one million are aged over 70 and therefore don’t have to pay a TV license. Let’s also say that another million don’t have licenses for any other reason. That leaves us with 21 million households, each paying (for argument’s sake, let’s say they’re all colour licenses) £142.50. With an estimated annual budget of £7 million, approximately 33p out of every television license gets spent on 6Music per year. I would work it out on a daily rate but the figure’s so exponentially small it’d make my calculator go nuts.

If the reasoning is down to the amount (or comparable lack) of listeners then this doesn’t make sense either. As there’s nothing to really compare 6Music to, the station is in a unique situation. It’s not going to attract the same kind of audiences at Radio 1 or Radio 2; it’s on the digital spectrum. It’s like trying to compare BBC4 audiences to BBC2’s; it just doesn’t compute. Out of the listening population, only 12% listens via DAB. So out of an estimated total audience of 51 million, there’s only 6.12 million that have the ability to listen (let’s leave out online listening for now). With a weekly audience of 695,000 (sourced from RAJAR), on an average week approximately 9% of the available audience listens to 6Music. It’s not the biggest market share, by all means – but it’s far greater than the 1% estimated in the Trust’s review in February. And this figure is rising all the time; over the past nine months the audience has grown by over 100,000. This growth in audience share is admittedly slow, but it proves that these people are dedicated, ever growing and don’t go away. Since 2005, by the same tone, it’s attracted almost half a million new and devoted listeners.

From personal experience, I have travelled all over the country setting up and presenting on both commercial and community radio stations and without doubt, every single station I’ve worked for could only dream of sounding like 6Music does. Nine times out of ten the only thing preventing them from doing this is the available budget. The BBC has the expenditure and the resources necessary to keep 6Music as a truly unique, unparalleled radio station. Throughout the station, from the on-air staff to the production team, the talent is of an unprecedented level. It’s extremely tight, unbelievably professional and results in eclectic radio that in terms of diversity can only really be compared to Radio 4.

The BBC is a multifarious network. There is no other broadcaster in the world with such a wide and varied portfolio of platforms. There is truly something for everyone, and the element of choice speaks volumes. 6Music leads the way in “real” radio. Without it, other broadcasters like myself will have nothing to aspire to and an entire generation of listeners will spend their days without the warmth that a simple radio station can offer.

Thank you for your time.

Pete Nottage

Tags:

Rage Against The X Factor?

by Pete 18. December 2009 23:11

It's amazing to think that the one thing I truly couldn't care less about has inspired me to write a piece detailing why I care that I couldn’t care less about it.

Nobody’s really bothered about the pop charts. No-one cares about them, no-one in their right mind could tell you what was number one in the charts on the 14th March (Flo Rida, in case you’re interested); no-one really gives a toss.

Until now.

In their infinite wisdom, someone has decided to set up a group on Facebook protesting against Joe McElderry, the well-meaning-yet-ultimately-gimpy-toothed-bubble-headed winner of The X Factor, becoming Christmas number one and for Rage Against The Machine’s rather angry Killing In The Name Of to take the top spot instead. The reasons for this are rather unclear, depending on who you talk to about it. Some people insist it’s merely “a bit of fun”; some people see it as an attempt to bring down Simon Cowell’s “empire”. Some people see it as bringing the idea of “choice” back into the pop chart, which is a silly statement in itself as you’re ultimately not going to get much choice with a pop chart. At the end of the day, all you’re going to get is pop.

So before we move on, we know one thing: none of these X Factor haters are really sure what they’re signing up to or the agreed reasons behind it. That’s a bit daft, really. You can have your individual reasons, by all means - yet not being clear on why is a fundamental flaw in any campaign.

The official line on the Facebook group is that it’s been set up for people who are “fed up of Simon Cowell’s latest karaoke act becoming number one”. Now, by the term “karaoke” I take it that they mean that they’re fed up of someone singing a song that wasn’t written by them. That makes sense; they’re championing true artists. Songs written and performed by the same act. Let’s look at the number ones from this year for an example.

Ah, here we go. Songs like Pixie Lott’s Mama Do - number one for a week in June. Written by….ooh, no - Mads Hauge and Phil Thornalley.

The Comic Relief song Islands In The Stream? Nope, sorry. That one was penned by the Bee Gees.

How’s about Kelly Clarkson’s My Life Would Suck Without You? Top of the charts in March? No mention of her as a writer. Max Martin, Dr. Luke and Claude Kelly take the credit for that.

The charts are full of songs like this; songs written by one person and performed by another. And you know why? Because peoplelike them. That’s the nature of the pop charts; brain teams up with beauty equals demand equals supply.

So if you’re a champion of Rage Against The Machine, what are you protesting about? If you're against the idea of the X Factor winner’s song, then you're just rallying against a subjective medium; something that in its very nature seems to be a little bit silly.

If you're against the "stranglehold grip" by Simon Cowell you're essentially tirading against one man who's been lucky enough to make a success out of what he does. You're complaining about someone being good at their job.

I’ve also been told that certain people don’t like the X Factor taking away from the spirit of the Christmas number one.

Ahem.

When you say that, what exactly do you mean? It’s not Christmassy enough for you? Count through the last twenty years worth of Christmas number ones. Do you see any festive hits there? No. You see Bob The Builder. You see Mr Blobby. You see the Spice Girls and you see Nizlopi. Very festive. Can you actually remember the last time there was an ACTUAL Christmas number one? No. And with good reason, too. Festive songs are TERRIBLE. As Bob Stanley writes in his Guardian article here – “For every Mud or Slade there's always been a Two Little Boys, an army of school choirs, and platoons of men in red and white velour headed by Clive Dunn or Shakin' Stevens – Christmas No 1s have usually been pretty feeble, and they still will be when Simon Cowell's empire finally fades away.”

So what else could you be complaining about? Let’s take it to its most basic level. What are the songs about? Lyrically, the X Factor song The Climb (made famous by Miley Cyrus/Hannah Montana; I’m never sure where one person ends and the other begins) describes a journey which is difficult but rewarding. Sickening, maybe. But a perfect metaphor for McElderry.

On the other side of things, there’s Killing In The Name Of, originally an anti-KKK song, which, according to the BBC, rails against "the military-industrial complex, justifying killing for the benefit of, as the song puts it, the chosen whites".

So, an anti-racism song, adopted by a bunch of stroppy, rebellious kids and wannabe students seemingly unaware that they have full control of the media they love to indulge in and complain about. The control’s called an off switch, in case you’re still wondering.

Whatever your reasons, by refusing people to have the free choice of listening to whatever song they want to, you’re forcing them to join one of two camps. So doesn’t that make you no better than Simon Cowell and his “empire”?

You can CHOOSE what you want to listen to and when you want to listen to it. That’s the beauty of music. If you don’t like a particular song, don’t listen to it. Don’t make it a simple binary decision between these two acts. You can do anything you want; you can even choose to listen to Bros, if you like; it’s a free world.

Don't get me wrong, I don't like the X Factor song. But it'll have fallen out of the charts in a week. I don't particularly like Joe McElderry. But I'm safe in the knowledge that he'll be dropped from his label and touring the West End within 18 months, where he can join the ranks of Ray Quinn and Darius in musical obscurity.

Similarly, I couldn’t care less if the only remaining copy of Killing In The Name Of melted in an horrendous accident involving Gail Porter and a traffic cone. Like many people I fondly remember dancing to it in various dingy, dirty nightclubs across the North West. But that was in the past, and that’s where it should stay, alongside living with the parents, Don’t Forget Your Toothbrush and bum worms.

To me, picking between the two acts is like picking between two identical cans of beige paint. Creating heavy marketing to take on something heavily marketed. Ah, the sweet, sweet smell of irony.

If you don't like the X Factor, don't have anything to do with it. That's fine. But don't instantly flock to the other side of the playground, chanting "my gang's bigger than your gang" - that's not musical choice, at best that’s a sixth-form mentality and at worst it’s downright bullying.

Rage against the X Factor? Fuck you; I won't do what you tell me.

Tags:

The Karly Off Of Big Brother Language Guide!

by Pete 15. June 2009 10:33

Introducing...
The latest line in cutting-edge language learning guides!Learn language the easy way with our easy-to-understandrange of linguaphone cassette tapes!
Yes, that's right. After only two weeks, you too can learn the lingo of Karly off of Big Brother! You can learn to enunciate just like everyody's favourite FHM-girl-turned-Big-Brother-housemate! There's no need to be stumped by her harsh Fife accent ever again!
No reading, no writing. Just listen and learn.

Click here for a sample.

SPECIAL OFFER!
Take advantage of this opportunity within 23 days and we'll send you a deep-fried Mars bar, a plate of gently steamed haggis and a deep Scottish resentment of the British, free of charge!*


*while stocks last

Tags:

Hanging On The Telephone...

by Pete 6. June 2009 18:04

Going though some old documents this afternoon, I came across this transcript from a message I received on my answerphone about two years ago. I'd like to share it with you, if I may:

It was left at 02:08AM, So I think alcohol may have been involved somewhere down the line.

"hiiii haha...is this pete? hi pete...d'you think...it's been a long time, mate...me and you...we could have been best friends but we...where did we meet? we went to some kind of half-arsed red hot chilli peppers impersonation funk band, but no, it's all good...g...b...well...met you at megsies party as well, meggsies...ooo...we're all up for the...but anyway,pete - you DO look cool, I do like your hair, I like your face as well, it's OK. Not quite sure about your clothes, but you know, we can...we can work on that. Let's get married. yeahhh! eveyone's getting married tonight, Pete! Everyone's getting married. Everyone. Yeah. Everyone. This jibber jabber. Hiiii! Come to trough! Oh, he lives in London. Next on Channel 4! This is Channel 4 News. Jon Snow's got a bad posture, but generally he's got a nice liver...deeeeey 4 in the big brother house...this is an impression of that Geordie feller what they keep employin' to do this...(sound of phone being put down. pause. silence., sound of phone being picked up again) ...he smells of aids. that's got the be the craziest message he's ever got...oh...it's still on! (sound of phone being put down)

Word for word accuracy, there.

Tags: